|
Conflict
on Earth is Caused by Cosmic Evil
Leoni Hodgson
The Tibetan refers to a war on cosmic levels [TCF 834], of which the wars
on earth must be just a tiny, tiny reflection. On one side we have the
Forces of Light centred on Sirius (the Hierarchy or White Lodge is its
representative on earth), on the other side is a centre of cosmic evil
found on the cosmic astral plane (the Black Lodge on Earth is its externalisation.)
[ExH 688] These solar and lunar forces are battling it out for the release
or control of the souls of men and creatures. A side-skirmish outbreak
of this cosmic conflict appeared on (the Moon Chain), and on earth in
the 4th root race on Atlantis. Cosmic evil gained access to earth's humanity.
[ExH 231] This evil manifested again in WW2. According to DK, this evil
is currently manifesting again through the triangle of evil - Central
Europe, Palestine, American Zionists (previous entry point were the Nazis).
What
are the ramifications if the Door to Evil is not closed?
1). A world war leading to the destruction of humanity! If nuclear weapons
are used in a major war, form life will become totally toxic for millions
of years. What then will the Masters do? They moved all life from the
3rd to the 4th chain to start anew. I do not think that all life can be
moved to the 5th Chain for the same reason. This chain is on the upward
arc, with finer bodies, so think it would violate occult law somehow.
This would mean waiting on earth for the millions (billions?) of years
for substance to become healed, then from primitive single-cell life,
starting the whole evolutionary arc again, in order to build the forms
through which the monads work.
2). Souls who fall into the control of the Black Masters are lost for
aeons. The normal evolutionary process which sees the escape of the spiritual
essence at the 4th Initiation is reversed by the Dark Ones. They shatter
the form, so that the central electric life is released in a way not intended,
then imprison the escaping essence. This absolutely disrupts the evolutionary
plan of the lives involved. [TCF 490].
3) Stalling the spiritual evolutionary process of all lives on the other
planets, of the Solar Logos, and of the Cosmic Logos - The One About Whom
Naught May Be Said – and one might say, the Plan of the Universal
Logos as well! A black day in hell!
|| Can you sense the potential disaster? DK says the times are urgent,
evil is entering into the world again, the Door must be closed!
The reason I wrote “The Jews, the Dream of
Returning to the Promised Land".
This was not to beat up the Jews, or to allocate blame. The whole of humanity
empties its emotional rage through the Jews – what a heavy load
to carry! We are all responsible for evil in the world and I tried to
make this clear in the paper. The Door opened because of our collective
selfishness.
No my purpose was to lay out certain facts – corroborated from various
sources, about the true cause of the conflict in Israel, and what needs
to be done to close the Door. I did this because DK specifically pinpointed
this conflict, and the nefarious influence of the Zionists, as the entry
point of evil at this current time! Closing the door requires specific
political action in America and Israel. It is as simple as that!
There are millions of people in western countries who believe that the
Palestinians are evil and the cause of all thetrouble. (They make their
contribution to the trouble, but are not the underlying cause!) This is
the result of the extraordinarily successful propaganda campaign waged
by the Israel Lobby. The weight of public opinion influences the choice
of political leaders, and political decisions. For example, our (just
now) ex-Prime Minister in Australia for 11 years, supported the Iraq invasion,
and every action taken by Israel against Palestinians, including the “security”
wall.
Most people in the world – including Australians,are still ruled
by their emotional natures, and therefore their glamours. So here, they
blindly support whatever action the PM wished to take! It is the same
in all countries in the world. In this instance, the world-wide support
for Zionist action in Israel is helping to force the Door open. And every
person who unconsciously supports these policies, is adding their weight
as well.
Papers such as mine, and subsequent debates, hopefully challenge people
to think about such matters. This directs focus to the mental plane, and
it is from the debate at this level - with soul help, that glamour is
destroyed, and wiser decisions are made. Accusations of "allocating
blame" miss the point“. You cannot fix what you don’t
acknowledge!” (Phil McGraw).
The actions of the Zionists are not widely known, and need to be exposed,
to provide an opportunity for people who have been holding to the previous
(bad Palestinian) belief, to correct their position. Not to swing to the
opposite side, but to a more neutral position. This is the underlying
purpose of my paper. All meditation in the world will not have an iota
of real impact, if most people in the world still hold to, and feed, the
“wrong idea.” Such a correction will bring balance to the
situation and allow the views of reasonable people in the world, humanitarians,
to be able to be expressed, and work out how to best meet the need of
both sides. This is being denied them in the current climate. DK said:
"I have no interest in helping or teaching those who divorce the
affairs of the world and of humanity from spiritual teaching and selfless
living. I have no use for mystical visionaries and esoteric students who
love to wander in the high realms of abstract thinking and amass details
of occult or mystical information, but who refuse to understand that the
changing of the old order, the awakening of humanity to the new possibilities
and the purification of the political and economic arena are today the
factors of the greatest spiritual value. That is spiritual which has for
motive the establishing of the Kingdom of God on Earth; that cannot take
place until much has been changed in human affairs and living." (POH,
1st Ed., p. 247)
[NB. The paper "“The Jews, the Dream of.." was not written
specifically for the Methuselah Group, but to add to the collective thought
in the mind of humanity].
Back
Contentious and Sensitive Issues in Group Dialogue
Leoni Hodgson
There
is a problem which can arise in a forum which discusses sensitive and
contentious issues, such as that of the Jews, and I would like to hear
what group members think. Generally, most people who choose to communicate
on this site will identify with the first of the following two groups
of thought:
1.
Those who hold to the esoteric viewpoint presented by the Tibetan via
AB - that there is Life, Consciousness, Form, and the spiritual task for
all is to evolve consciousness from the lower to the higher. There is
an acceptance that, that which is written in the AB books about the Jews,
is the work of the Tibetan Master, and he meant what he said! One could
say then that this ‘Tibetan philosophy’, is the body of thought,
the life, upon which this group has been founded. Such people are identifying
with their souls, and their soul inclusiveness is evidence of this.
2.
Then there will be a smaller number who hold the opposite point of view,
that 1), what is written could be the work of Bailey and therefore is
discredited, or 2), it is the work of the Tibetan but he didn’t
really mean what he said on the face of it, or he is just wrong. In any
event, the words written are discredited. We may think that such people
still have strong identification with the “form nature, with their
personalities, with their race or nation.
I note that a goal of TMP, is to evolve a more tolerant and compassionate
viewpoint that will contribute to peace and understanding in the world.
I interpret this as meaning that, apart from any meditation work towards
this goal, the first group will try to help the second group, see the
situation through the Master’s eyes, from the level of the soul,
from the higher point of view. And when/ if this is achieved, it should
naturally lead towards the desired world aim. A worthy and very creditable
goal.
And
here is the problem, and it has to do with protecting the group life and
integrity. If people come onto the forum who reject the philosophy of
the Tibetan, who are not convinced through subsequent discussion, and
may even then become rude in their communications, what is to be done?
Is it possible to achieve the group aim when such a stand-off has developed?
What value is there, in continuing dialogue, with someone who will not
be convinced to accept DK’s or the higher point of view? We have
the current example with our group brother Abraham. We are trying to explain
to the world that the seemingly harsh comments are really not harsh, when
seen in a broader light. That the blunt assessment of Jewish “terroristic
action” is accurate if facts on the ground are assessed without
the distortion of glamour. And that accepting this assessment is a step
in the direction of achieving world peace. This is a big ask for people
who hold firmly to a contrary point of view. And what do we do when it
is rejected? Do we continue the exchange ad infinitum, with the possibility
that it becomes unhealthy for the group? Or do we halt it? If so how?
The person who is not familiar with the Master’s train of thought,
whose consciousness is still very much identified with form and the personality
life, such an ego could never understand or appreciate the true intent
of the Master’s words when He simply and directly, lays out the
truth as it is. All such an ego experiences when His words are read, is
harshness and attack. Then he or she will tend to see those who support
the Master’s point of view as the enemy. Subsequently, the group
could become the repository of resentment, poisonous thoughts; or glamour
and illusion could contaminate, and damage the group life. DK spoke about
such dangers.
In such a climate, some may modify what they contribute, for fear of offending
the too-sensitive ego, or fear that they may come under attack. Some may
think that if such souls leave the group, it is a mark of failure against
the group. But is it? This group after all is composed of occult thinkers,
and a person with crystallised thinking could have his or her shell deepened
as they hunker down in defence. They would probably be safer, and proceed
more adequately elsewhere. An example of appropriate exclusion is the
Master’s Ashram, where probationers are held outside the periphery
of the Master’s consciousness until they prove themselves. Not that
I am proposing such a thing.
Dialogue
is an important component of the group, but where is the line drawn? And
how is it drawn. Or is there no line? Should the group have a code of
ethics? I am interested in the thoughts of others.
Response by PL:
I am well aware of your dilemma, indeed, I have had this experience before
on other forums. I have argued with the likes of several Jewish Bailey
students - as have others of us here, Michael, James, Uta to name some
who immediately come to mind. With one or two in particular we 'bent over
backwards' (several years ago) for months of intense exchanges online
to reason with these people. To no avail ultimately. I swore I would never
subject myself to that again, and that my time would be better spent writing
for those with 'ears to hear'.
Recently
I made the remark privately to a friend that some of the problem is a
generational thing and that I should not waste my time on that, hoping
to make more of a dent in younger generations. Yet who is to know how
crystallised they will be either? A forum is like an ashram of sorts:
"An Ashram is an international group; it is composed of souls in
incarnation and out of incarnation; it is a synthesis of initiates of
various degrees and of accepted disciples. The Masters do not regard those
who have taken the first initiation as initiates. This is a point which
needs re-emphasis. ... "
An Ashram is, therefore, representative of all stages of unfoldment, from
the most advanced to beginners, such as those who read these instructions.
The point of importance to each disciple in an Ashram is whether he can
step up his consciousness and his conscious response to the ashramic vibration
so that he does not hinder the planned activities of the Ashram. Must
the senior and the more advanced initiate-disciples halt, or wait and
step down their activities so as to give the less advanced the time and
opportunity to measure up to them? The question therefore is: Do the senior
disciples wait or do the junior disciples hinder?
I would assure you that the standard of measurement is not a dead level
and I would assure beginners that they cannot hinder the advanced members
of an Ashram, but that they can throw themselves out of the sphere of
activity, though not out of the group. It is the unready and the untrained
who do the waiting, not the ready and the truly dedicated." DINAI-728.
I
stress that we "seek to emulate" an ashram...as aspirants and
disciples...So rest assurred, this group will not subject itself to exercises
in futility or self-flagellation!
Back
|